<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Jon Stewart sucked?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ipatrix.com/1137/jon-stewart-sucked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ipatrix.com/1137/jon-stewart-sucked/</link> <description>Crossing Borders Crossing Cultures</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:20:00 -0500</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Patrix</title><link>http://www.ipatrix.com/1137/jon-stewart-sucked/#comment-6056</link> <dc:creator>Patrix</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 03:24:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipatrix.com/2006/03/06/jon-stewart-sucked/#comment-6056</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Ed&lt;/strong&gt;, I watched his monologue yesterday and I have to agree with you about the awkward pauses. And his pauses are always his humor hallmarks but somehow they don&#039;t work for  the Oscar stage. Was he nervous?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ed</strong>, I watched his monologue yesterday and I have to agree with you about the awkward pauses. And his pauses are always his humor hallmarks but somehow they don&#8217;t work for  the Oscar stage. Was he nervous?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ed bremson</title><link>http://www.ipatrix.com/1137/jon-stewart-sucked/#comment-6054</link> <dc:creator>ed bremson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 02:59:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipatrix.com/2006/03/06/jon-stewart-sucked/#comment-6054</guid> <description>I mostly liked Jon Stewart Sunday night, but I did think his delivery was a little slow. Billy Crystal was always crisp and fast. With Stewart there were a lot of (to me) awkward pauses.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mostly liked Jon Stewart Sunday night, but I did think his delivery was a little slow. Billy Crystal was always crisp and fast. With Stewart there were a lot of (to me) awkward pauses.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Patrix</title><link>http://www.ipatrix.com/1137/jon-stewart-sucked/#comment-6036</link> <dc:creator>Patrix</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 18:42:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipatrix.com/2006/03/06/jon-stewart-sucked/#comment-6036</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Bongo&lt;/strong&gt;, I read some of the jokes that he cracked but often the best part of his comedy routine is the way he delivers them. But you are right, Oscars are a pretty staid stage for any humor and in spite of that Billy Crystal had always impressed
&lt;strong&gt;Kuttan&lt;/strong&gt;, for a rabid Stewart fan, it is easily believable that most of the audience didn&#039;t get it. His humor is much more...dare I say, &#039;intellectual&#039; (in spite of his wierd face expressions) and the sarcastic sense of humor doesn&#039;t go down well with everyone.Â  But then again, his humor might not be suited for the Oscar stage where you need one-liners that can be mouthed by a robot equally well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bongo</strong>, I read some of the jokes that he cracked but often the best part of his comedy routine is the way he delivers them. But you are right, Oscars are a pretty staid stage for any humor and in spite of that Billy Crystal had always impressed</p><p><strong>Kuttan</strong>, for a rabid Stewart fan, it is easily believable that most of the audience didn&#8217;t get it. His humor is much more&#8230;dare I say, &#8216;intellectual&#8217; (in spite of his wierd face expressions) and the sarcastic sense of humor doesn&#8217;t go down well with everyone.Â  But then again, his humor might not be suited for the Oscar stage where you need one-liners that can be mouthed by a robot equally well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kuttan</title><link>http://www.ipatrix.com/1137/jon-stewart-sucked/#comment-6035</link> <dc:creator>Kuttan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 18:42:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipatrix.com/2006/03/06/jon-stewart-sucked/#comment-6035</guid> <description>Im a long time Jon Stewart fan and I loved his perfomance. Some of the jokes were typical Jon Stewart (the subtle jabs) and suprisingly I think much of the audience didnt even get it. Im not suprised with the WaPost review.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im a long time Jon Stewart fan and I loved his perfomance. Some of the jokes were typical Jon Stewart (the subtle jabs) and suprisingly I think much of the audience didnt even get it. Im not suprised with the WaPost review.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BongoPondit</title><link>http://www.ipatrix.com/1137/jon-stewart-sucked/#comment-6034</link> <dc:creator>BongoPondit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 17:44:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipatrix.com/2006/03/06/jon-stewart-sucked/#comment-6034</guid> <description>I watched the show specifically for Jon Stewart. I would say he did a &#039;okay&#039; job. He did not have the audience rolling on the floor, but there were some nice jokes (I loved it when he said Bjork was supposed to come to the show but was shot by Dick Cheney - referring to Bjork&#039;s infamous &#039;swan&#039; dress many Oscars ago). Frankly speaking, if you think about it, all the host needs to do is deliver an opening monolgue, which has become predictable (poke fun at Hollwyood, some celebrities, maybe a sly political dig) and then introduce some of the presenters with a funny line - they might as well get a robot for that.
The thing is that Jon Stewart makes a living by mocking institutions such as the Academy, that takes itself waaay too seriously. In any other year, all the hyperobolic, self-reverential pomp and paegentry at the Oscars would have been material for his Monday evening show ( I am guessing he will still make fun of himself). There is only so much scatching satire you can direct at the people who are paying for your gig.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched the show specifically for Jon Stewart. I would say he did a &#8216;okay&#8217; job. He did not have the audience rolling on the floor, but there were some nice jokes (I loved it when he said Bjork was supposed to come to the show but was shot by Dick Cheney &#8211; referring to Bjork&#8217;s infamous &#8216;swan&#8217; dress many Oscars ago). Frankly speaking, if you think about it, all the host needs to do is deliver an opening monolgue, which has become predictable (poke fun at Hollwyood, some celebrities, maybe a sly political dig) and then introduce some of the presenters with a funny line &#8211; they might as well get a robot for that.</p><p>The thing is that Jon Stewart makes a living by mocking institutions such as the Academy, that takes itself waaay too seriously. In any other year, all the hyperobolic, self-reverential pomp and paegentry at the Oscars would have been material for his Monday evening show ( I am guessing he will still make fun of himself). There is only so much scatching satire you can direct at the people who are paying for your gig.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
