26th July in Houston

The tropical storm in the Gulf of Mexico caused heavy rainfall in Houston today. I am not sure how Bombay is doing today but I bet it is doing much better than last year on this date. I drove back to College Station earlier today morning amidst the kind of rain that I have seen only in India. Official figures now put it at almost 9 inches of rain since morning in Houston; the second heavy downpour in as many months. Of course, global warming and weather changing threats are not quite popular here. I had a tough time driving on US-290, the northwestward-bound highway toward College Station since I could barely see the lights of the vehicle ahead of me. At some point, it felt as if someone was dumping a huge bucketful of water all over my car or I am just going through 40 miles of carwash.

Rainfall in the US is pretty mild and heavy rainfall as this one is often termed as a thunderstorm that usually lasts not more than 15-20 minutes. I have driven through quite a few thunderstorms; incidentally always drive through one when I go to a new city [has happened when I drove into Orlando, New Orleans, and Houston (last year)]. But lately, the incidence of ‘heavy’ rainfall has become more frequent and a similar downpour impeded our return to Boston from Maine. Somehow I managed to make it home to College Station after roughly taking half an hour more than I usually do.

That said, I don’t mind the rain if asked to choose it over the intense Texas heat.


Related Posts

  1. Rains Again
  2. Rita Help
  3. God Bless America and No Place else

  • http://www.ujvalgandhi.com Ujval Gandhi

    [Patrix] I remember recommending the The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World by Bjørn Lomborg as another view on the global warming threat.

    I wonder what Bjorn has to say now on all this. Environment, just like the global economy is so inter-linked !!

  • http://ipatrix.com Patrix

    Ujval, I haven’t read Lomborg. Is he a global warming skeptic? Probably the global environment isn’t inter-linked in way that we can comprehend but there certainly are few linkages that trigger off reciprocal changes elsewhere. I am no climatologist to understand those.

  • http://www.ujvalgandhi.com Ujval

    http://ujvalgandhi.blogspot.com/2005/07/is-world-really-warming.html

    Yes, he is a big critic of the entire global warming research. SOme of his points were used in Crichton’s latest book also

    Ujval

  • http://ipatrix.com Patrix

    Ujval, I’m sorry. I rather believe the vast majority (now almost all!) of scientists who firmly testify that global warming is real and caused by human intervention. Statistics can be twisted to suit one’s purpose.

    Crichton, as I have written earlier is not exactly the role model I would look up to although I enjoy his work. I cannot recommend this movie more especially for skeptics like you. Please go out and see it today (or tomorrow!)

  • http://kaisare.net/wlog/ Niket

    Another egg on the face of global warming deniers:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/27/opinion/27doran.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

    Our results have been misused as “evidence” against global warming by Michael Crichton in his novel “State of Fear” and by Ann Coulter in her latest book, “Godless: The Church of Liberalism.” Search my name on the Web, and you will find pages of links to everything from climate discussion groups to Senate policy committee documents — all citing my 2002 study as reason to doubt that the earth is warming. One recent Web column even put words in my mouth. I have never said that “the unexpected colder climate in Antarctica may possibly be signaling a lessening of the current global warming cycle.” I have never thought such a thing either.

    (emphasis on the last sentence is mine)