http://www.ipatrix.com/1847/redirecting-to-www/ Crossing Borders Crossing Cultures Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:20:00 -0500 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.ipatrix.com/1847/redirecting-to-www/#comment-8928 Patrix Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:08:29 +0000 http://www.ipatrix.com/2007/01/31/redirecting-to-www/#comment-8928 <strong>Paul</strong>, Dinn know no-www was a movement. Really. :) Paul, Dinn know no-www was a movement. Really. :)

]]> http://www.ipatrix.com/1847/redirecting-to-www/#comment-8927 Paul Goscicki Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:33:42 +0000 http://www.ipatrix.com/2007/01/31/redirecting-to-www/#comment-8927 Uhm, <a href="http://no-www.org/" rel="nofollow">no-www.org</a>. Really. Uhm, no-www.org. Really.

]]> http://www.ipatrix.com/1847/redirecting-to-www/#comment-8926 Patrix Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:03:06 +0000 http://www.ipatrix.com/2007/01/31/redirecting-to-www/#comment-8926 <strong>Abhijit</strong>, I understand your point too. As long as readers don't have to type in the extra letters, I am fine with either ways. I agree with John that 'www' helps to differentiate between other prefixes like ftp, etc. Abhijit, I understand your point too. As long as readers don’t have to type in the extra letters, I am fine with either ways. I agree with John that ‘www’ helps to differentiate between other prefixes like ftp, etc.

]]> http://www.ipatrix.com/1847/redirecting-to-www/#comment-8925 Abhijit Nadgouda Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:25:26 +0000 http://www.ipatrix.com/2007/01/31/redirecting-to-www/#comment-8925 I have done the exact opposite, <a href="http://ifacethoughts.net/2007/01/12/i-support-no-www/" rel="nofollow">I support no-WWW</a> :-) I have done the exact opposite, I support no-WWW :-)

]]>