Beware of the Gay Bomb

Imagine this – the U.S military sent in by the belligerent White House following a terrorist attack unleashes its most deadliest weapon. The B-52 bombers drop its payload right on top of the rogue regime’s biggest city and transforms it to – San Francisco. A month later, an orange bridge pops up, chic beauty salons and fancy coffee shops are bustling with people as a Pride parade makes it way down the street. Flummoxed? Well, you can’t make such stuff up.

It was recently revealed that the U.S. military was working on a hormone bomb that would turn enemy combatants into homosexuals and make them more interested in sex than fighting. I am not sure what is more funny; that you can make people gay or the belief that gay people are always obsessed about sex and hence won’t fight. The proposal suggested, “One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior” and even budgeted the proposal at $7.5 million. So if such a bomb was indeed developed and detonated, you would be Saving Ryan’s privates. Or burrowing into foxholes could have a whole different meaning. Or surprising the enemy by attacking them from the rear. Imagine a gay Bin Laden. Ah! the possibilities are endless. Someone at the DoD took the adage, Make Love not War far too seriously.

Update: The military gay bomb has now inspired an adult movie.

tags: , , ,


Related Posts

  1. Gay Marriage is Un-American?
  2. No Country for Gay Men
  3. Choice to be Gay

  • http://uberdesi.com Santosh

    They’re taking the hippie slogan of “Make love not war” too far :-)

  • http://pikeyspeak.com Piker

    Hilarious stuff! :) Although I would have preferred to throw a tranny bomb. That would make the soldiers implode with embarrasment. (I would hope so!)

  • http://www.ipatrix.com Patrix

    Santosh, no better way to bring back the hippie age, eh?

    Piker, heh. If you could only ‘transform’ enemy combatants any which way you like, Gitmo would be a laugh riot :)

  • http://mavericksmusing.blogpsot.com Sakshi

    Hmm. So the basic assumption is that gay men will not fight but will try to groom the enemy combatants. So all the gay men being fired from US army were fired because they were just prettying the army barracks up?

  • http://www.ipatrix.com Patrix

    Sakshi, I’m sure the soldiers wouldn’t mind prettying up the barracks even if such a characterization were true :)

  • http://uberdesi.com Santosh

    On a more serious note, it seems to me like it would transform them into sex maniacs. This could actually prove counter-productive especially for POWs.

  • http://www.ipatrix.com Patrix

    Santosh, yup! sex deprivation could then be used as a torture technique.