The Rise and Fall of Sarah Palin

While Sarah Palin and her ardent supporters may not think that she has fallen, her decision to quit as the Governor of Alaska halfway through her first term may be the death knell to her still-nascent political life. Her rambling explanation on the July 4th weekend failed to convince anyone on either side of the spectrum. Even the timing was either to overshadow the frenzy of Michael Jackson’s media coverage or hide behind it.

She narrated quite a few reasons pertaining to her decision and as best as anyone could make out, the primary ones were that she didn’t want to waste taxpayer dollars on defending ‘frivolous’ ethics complaints and she was angry that the liberal media was picking on her and her family. Regards the ethics complaints, I would think the natural precaution would be not to act unethically and as far as I know, such complaints have persisted even before she shot to the limelight. Also, only three ethics complaints are pending and her excuse of saving taxpayer money on defending against such complaints falls flat when you realize that the money is already budgeted for the lawyers whether they are defending her or not. The excuse of media bashing is as lame as it can get and if her children were covered and discussed in the media and blogs because she paraded them during the campaign for her political benefit. And barring Letterman’s off-color joke, I don’t think her children have been subject to any less than what Chelsea Clinton was subjected by U.S. senators no less. The public spotlight can be intense, glaring, and brutal and if you wish to keep your family away, don’t involve them in the first place. You cannot have it both ways.

Also, any criticism by the media or blogs is not by default character assassination. If you wish for no media scrutiny then you should have lived in the pre-1991 Russia, the place that you can see from your front porch. Threatening to sue bloggers and throwing tantrums at them only boosts their readership and makes them famous. As Curious Gawker wonders (on Twitter), how did America send a man to the moon and then come to admire a woman who claims proximity to Russia as her foreign policy experience? But then I have seen my share of American stupidity over the past eight years. The recent election gave me hope that Americans have seen their folly and want a responsible adult in charge of their country. Too bad that Republicans cannot find one amongst them. They are either flying off to Argentina to bang their mistresses or giving media interview in fishing gear after quitting the job whose duties they are still expected to discharge until the end of the month.

A Governor midway through a first term is not a lame-duck even if you don’t want to run for a second term. By that logic, any second-term position is worthless and not worth investing your time in although most politicians find a second-term or a lame-duck period to get most done. Sarah Palin’s answer to a tough job – quit and ask for a new one that will open up four year later. If elected, how sure are we that she won’t quit two years into her new job citing media complaints? Only some people with half an ounce of brain can spin a quitter as being political shrewd. It is evidence of a narcissistic attitude and inability to be responsible for your current job in hopes of wanting a new one. Defending her, many say that it might be a smart political move but is it really in the best interests of the country especially from a party that loves to tout its ‘Country First’ slogan? As the writer of the above linked article claims, it is more about politics than about governing but the means cannot be more important than the end. America seems to be in a constant campaign mode which while being good for the media makes everyone else worse-off. At least in India, you don’t campaign until a few months before the polls open.

For those who think that Sarah Palin has been unfairly treated in the media, you have to simply take a look at her ten most awkward moments in the recent past. Some media interviews and other PR appearances gone awry. If she thinks any publicity is good publicity, then I hope she realizes that she is not hawking a cola. Even those brands guard their image carefully in today’s age of blogs and Twitter. Since the current crop of Republicans or what is left of them will accept any candidate who sounds folksy (even though most Americans don’t), then trying to win over independents is the key. But independents view her unfavorably almost 2-to-1 and we have come to realize from previous experiences that more people see of Sarah Palin, the less they like her. Instead of her current penchant for tamashas, she better hone up on solid policy issues and show herself to be capable and intelligent leader, which I’m sure she isn’t. But trying to be won’t hurt.

The rise of Sarah Palin also underlines the racial hypocrisy that still exists in America. Barack Obama had to fight hard to overcome his ‘blackness’ and show himself as an intelligent, smart, articulate leader who could appeal beyond his race. His family was scrutinized endlessly and even patently false and insidious allegations, some made by Palin herself (‘palling around with terrorists’) were propagated wildly in the media. The entire ’3am phone call’ questioned his leadership and decision-making skills. No complaints of liberal media then. But Palin, with her pregnant teenage daughter who then proceeded to break off with her child’s father that she had said she would marry and lack of any solid educational and professional qualifications, is considered a serious contender to the White House by the media. If she were black, she wouldn’t even garner a second look much less serious thought. If meritocracy is treasured by the Republicans, we can clearly sense the hypocrisy here.

Will Sarah Palin get the Republican nomination to challenge Obama or will future train wrecks (of course, there will be more) bury her for good? With the economy front and center on people’s mind still and will also be at the next election, merely parroting tax cuts ain’t going to sound convincing. But something tells me that she will be eaten alive by her own party. After all, Republican men are unlikely to let a woman tell them what to do, their newly-found love for pseudo feminism notwithstanding. Once the primary fights begin and old warhorses like Romney, Huckbee or even Gingrich step in, she will be hopelessly out of depth. Good looks and a need to be in the news cycle can only take you so far. And even those aren’t permanent.


Related Posts

  1. US Weekly will shape Sarah Palin’s image
  2. Problems on the Campaign Trail
  3. Why Are We Obsessed with Palin?

  • Sally Hill

    I’m afraid I’m going to have to disagree with you. Sorry, but your article got a little long and rambling and a bit incoherent, I was unable to read the whole thing – rest assured, I got the drift.

    I’m one of those middle of the road type people who had given up on Palin – felt that she has faded into the sunset way up there in Alaska, and had started looking at where Romney stood on issues that are important to me. That is until Palin resigned (for whatever reason – I could careless!). She had my support in 2008 and IF she decides to run in 2012 she will have my FULL and COMPLETE support again.

    It’s odd that liberals couldn’t understand her – maybe the operative words should be ‘didn’t want to’ understand or hear her. She said what she meant and meant what she said. It really was pretty simple. Maybe those that didn’t understand are not mothers themselves. I saw a mama-bear standing up there ready to protect her family and cubs from the media. Then I saw a woman who is deeply committed to what she believes and puts her ideals and integrity above self-gain. I know liberals don’t see it that way, but then we see Obama the way you all see Palin. Hummm…interesting, huh?

    Yes, Palin has made some mistakes and she does seem to be behind the ball in some policy areas, but so does Obama and his followers think he is great! I think anyone who doesn’t know how many states are in the union has no business being President – we won’t even speak about his ability to see dead people (that’s just creepy!). Talk about awkward moments!

    I wished there were some way for me to separate myself from him when he apologizes for Americans. I don’t apologize for ANYTHING and I sure wished he wouldn’t speak for me. Foreign policy is another area he is a bit naive and needs to refresh his history lessons. I know he was elected by the people to speak for the US Citizens as a whole, but dangit – at least he could root FOR us rather than AGAINST us.

    Odd how you seem to see Obama as a black man – I don’t. When I see him or take the time to listen to him, I see and hear a white man. I see a white man standing there with a huge question mark over his head. Coming from a modest, mid-American home – how did he attend private high school and ivy league colleges? How did he travel around the world and meet the people he associated himself with? I wonder just how black people would see him if he had married a white woman?

    Palin has a long way to go – I’ll give you that, but I think she convinced more people than you know on July 3rd. We are tired of politics as usual – something Obama vehemently declared he would not continue once in office. Yet, I am constantly checking to make sure it is actually Obama in office and not STILL Bush. I think Palin showed the world she is NOT about politics as usual and she is NOT going to play the game by Washington’s out of date rules. Time will tell.

    Thank you for the article and for keeping her out there in the limelight!

    • http://www.ipatrix.com Patrix

      Errr…this post was about Palin and not Obama. And more importantly,

      I’m afraid I’m going to have to disagree with you.Sorry, but your article got a little long and rambling and a bit incoherent, I was unable to read the whole thing – rest assured, I got the drift.

      If you haven’t read the whole thing, you don’t really know what my arguments are, do you? So what are you disagreeing with?

      • http://emptyhipflask.wordpress.com/ Alan Smithee

        I read the whole thing and you don’t seem to have any arguments. So there is nothing to agree or disagree.

        • http://www.ipatrix.com Patrix

          Unless you are Sally Hill, your comment is irrelevant to unasked questions.

  • Gunner Sykes

    If Sarah Palin runs for president, she will win. First she will get rid of the deadwood in the Republican Party, then she will get rid of the deadwood in the federal government. That’s the real reason she is hated; that’s the reason for articles like yours. If you really considered her an incompetent, you would simply have a chuckle and forget about her, right?

    So, could you tell me something?

    I’m genuinely curious about it, Your article says exactly the same thing a number of other articles say — the reference to narcissism, the thinly veiled accusation of racism, the generally smarmy tone, the willful misinterpretation of the phrase “lame duck,” the appraisal of her recent speech as rambling and incoherent.

    Is there a template you guys use?

    • http://www.ipatrix.com Patrix

      I must admire your continual optimism. After nearly 20 years of supposedly conservative rule from the past 28 years, you still believe that Republicans can make government smaller. It has only grown over the years. And same things are said about Palin is because they are facts and she hasn’t been able to answer them except scream media bias. As far as the template goes, it is the Republican party that claims to have ‘talking points’

  • http://murungakka.blogspot.com I

    This post is devoid of the ignorance you usually exhibit. You seem to have graduated. To what, I am not sure.

    • http://www.ipatrix.com Patrix

      Sorry to disappoint.

  • http://www.suyogdeshpande.net/blog/ Supremus

    Sarah Palin should become president, and then must resign within 6 months citing that the president of nicaragua insulted her, and Iranian president joked abt her. She’s not a quitter after all, but a do-er! She does quitting best, but that’s beside the point :)

    The comments above truly indicate why I shouldn’t be surprised if she really gets elected! And they’ll be the same ppl I am sure who’ll understand her resignation 6 months later too hehe!

    S

    • http://www.ipatrix.com Patrix

      Late-night comedians will be thrilled. They are missing Bush already.

  • http://lotusnova.blogspot.com Amit

    Regarding awkward moments, we all saw Sarah Palin’s. But you can find a few of Obama’s on youtube and those weren’t splashed around in the media (self-censoring? putting clothes on the naked emperor by the media?). There’s one of him fumbling for words at a town-hall meeting, another one showing his frustration at a teleprompter malfunction during the primaries. And he may be black, but he acted white – and that’s why he was elected, because the liberal whites didn’t see him as a threat, unlike, say, Jesse Jackson or other black leaders who are much more vocal than Obama is, about black people’s rights. Many of the attacks against Obama (his religion) came from Hillary during the primaries, so let’s not solely blame the Republicans here.

    I’m no fan of Sarah Palin or the Republicans, BTW, just to preempt that angle. ;)

    • http://www.ipatrix.com Patrix

      Oh yeah! Obama has had his share of awkward moments too. But considering that he has been in the spotlight for a good part of two years during the primary fight, the incidences have been few and far between. Hillary Clinton had her share of moments but largely she emerged unscathed and didn’t lose respect. And we know how she was loved and hated with equal passion. Comparatively, Palin’s antics seem more like creating a buzz rather than appearing intelligent or stable. Her pronouncements and speeches include just complaints and rants but no policy positions.

      Even the few issues that she claims she feels strongly for are because of personal connections. E.g. interest in special needs kids because she has one. So if she has to be sufficiently interested in AIDS prevention awareness, should we wait until someone close to her has AIDS?

    • http://www.indimag.com Madhu Rao

      Amit,
      The good thing about America is that quite a few people speak their mind. I supported Obama but am now a Maher-Democrat. I agree with Maher when he ranted that Obama needs to borrow a tad of dubya’s swagger and not bother about ratings a la Lindsey Lohan. Maher was and is pro Obama, but does speak his mind.

      While there is no denying that the media is biased and a tad favorable to Obama whatever the reasons, there is no denying the same at the opposite end of the spectrum — switch on Fox and they are busy spinning Palin’s resignation as a maverick move.

      Palin has herself to blame. The fact that Couric and ‘Charlie’ are nominated for Emmys says a lot about how effective they were and how Palin was not. Palin tied herself to knots with seemingly innocuous questions, made a fool of herself, and now she quits ? If this is not her death knell I’m not sure what is… ?

      Couldn’t agree more with the author..

      • http://lotusnova.blogspot.com Amit

        Madhu, I see that you are still operating within the two-party paradigm, so the way you look at, and evaluate issues is tied in with what the other party (Republican) does – which results in Democrat apologists. Luckily, I don’t have any such constraints and I have no problem using parameters that are independent of the corrupt two-party system. :)

        Also, please read the last line of my previous comment.