Theory or Fact?

Trust Georgia to turn back time when even the developing nations are using science to surge ahead. Recently the Cobb County School System inserted disclaimers in biology textbooks stating that “Evolution is a theory, not a fact”. Although the statement sounds ludicrous, I cannot but wonder at the incongruity of rational thought here. The statement is now severely under the semantics microscope and even has scientists divided. A little bit of background, however makes things much clearer. The opposition to Darwin’s forward leap in understanding our origins stems from deep-rooted belief in Creationism propounded by conservative Christians. Although creationism has been repeatedly proven infactual, religious bigots insist on offering this “alternative view” to students. Only a minority still believes that evolution is “a scientific theory well-supported by evidence.” [via Washington Monthly]

Admittedly evolution is a theory but then it’s a rigorously tested theory and has withstood several attempts under the experimental axe to disprove it. By that logic, all facts in science are theories and cannot be proven beyond doubt. Even the observable facts are rendered fallible because of their dependence on our sensory perception. Ever heard of the maxim — do not always trust what you see? Karl Popper understood this fallacy and laid out this theory of falsifiability i.e. a theory can be valid only if it is falliable and stands on the assumption that it can be falsified (his take was replaced by a better Lakatosian theory but more on that sometime later). A statement that it may or may not rain today is not acceptable because it cannot be falsified and covers its bases. However, a theory is strengthened if it manages to weather attacks of trying to disprove it while holding on to its garb of falsifiability. If you do not believe in my theory, disprove it and propose a theory of your own — is the crux of the argument. Evolution similarly has withstood such tests of falsifiability and in fact, has been strengthened in recent times by examples of mutating bacteria. Thousands of archeological sites all over the world effectively delineate the path of evolution. But as Ross admits in an episode of Friends, there always exists a teeny-weeny possibility that it might be wrong. But in absence of opposing evidence, it is construed as fact by the scientific community.

Many such examples abound in the history of science. Gravitational theory, proposed by Newton also effectively is a theory but is not questioned by the same conservatives. The Church castigated Galileo for his claims that the heavenly bodies are not perfectly spherical objects. It doubted the capabilities of his newly-invented telescope but did not for a moment, stop to think for a moment that they might be wrong.

Let us not get caught up in semantics here. Admitted that evolution is a theory but for all practical purposes, it is a scientific fact in absence of a better explanatory theory. The basis for the Cobb County School Board of course is not dabbling in such subtle differences but rooted mainly in keeping children away for the theory of evolution. I hope they do not succeed in influencing young impressionable minds and keeping them away from rational thought. No wonder Georgia voted for Bush again. But in a country where 25% still believe this long-debunked theory [PDF link], I am suddenly seeing sense.



  • passerby

    I admit I havent done a thorough study of both the evolution and creationism theories. From what lil’ I know, I think the truth lies somewhere in the middle. Neither did God create man in the form he has today nor did humans evolve totally from apes. Yeah, there is evidence about the evolution of the physical form but that doesnt explain the fundamental difference between man and monkeys- the ability to discern and discriminate. That function is quintessentially human. And that function is not to be underestimated. It’s a chasm which none of the lower animals has been able to cross. That makes me want to lean towards creationism (even if it reeks of old fashionsim). I think i’ll stick to my own theory- that the physical form of humans in the begining resembled monkeys and evolved to homo sapiens over the centuries, but humans were from the begining a different class.

    Half-baked, eh? Sorry if you can’t make sense of that.

  • http://www.livejournal.com/users/ashweeta Ash

    Aargh ! Now you’ve got me as agitated and up in arms as Ross. I get really mad and start spluttering at poeple who scoff evolution, specially the intelligent types who know what its all about and still refuse to accept. Now thats what I call blind faith.

    Frankly, I dont care two hoots if someone chooses to believe that the world was created in seven days, or that aliens landed and seeded life on the earth or this entire world is someone’s dream or whatever. But, hey, dont shove that opinion down my thorat or on impressionable young minds. Give them all the relevant information, and let them decide.

  • http://patrix.typepad.com Patrix

    Passerby – I wouldn’t believe that you would believe in creationism. But of course, everyone is entitled to their opinion. It is the blatant subversion (by the church lobbyists) of the opposing widely accepted scientific notion that I cannot tolerate.

    Ash – It just gets more and more interesting with each aspect of the curricula being monitored closely. Instead they should just let the educators do their job and go back to writing Social Security checks.

  • nobreakfast

    C’mon… Enough already.
    People who believe Creationist ideas aren’t ‘conservative christians’ and certainly not ‘bigots’ for doing so. They are simply people who hold opinoins different from the main stream and who are at worst, simply mistaken.
    Sure, some of them go overboard in their pursuit, but so do you and other people of the sort who sport stickers on their cars with DARWIN in a fish symbol.
    I’m tired of reading about it, and didn’t read further in your blog item than your name-calling.
    Certainly you can do better.

  • http://patrix.typepad.com Patrix

    Nobreakfast – Notice that I didn’t mean those labels merely for having those beliefs but rather imposing them on the school system. Argue and deliberate all you like in philosophy clubs but leave the schools alone is my only concern. But thanks for your opinion.

  • http://puredrivelling.blogspot.com Prashant

    Dude, what do you expect from a red state ;)???

    I agree with you though.. Evolution though a theory is the best possible explaination to life as we know it today.. Now the original Darwin theory has undergone lots of changes because we’ve discovered many new things about genetics… But it does not mean that the theory doesnt hold.. Infact it only solidifies what Darwin (and Wallace) originally proposed and its wrong to just say (especially to school kids) that its some random theory not a fact..

  • http://broodingdude.rediffblogs.com Kiran

    That is a great topic to crusade over (pardon the terminology here!) :)

    Calling evolution a theory is not wrong in itself, if all other theories in the book are called so. Maybe it has been included for the wrong reasons but consider this: evolution even today has many loopholes. It simply remains the most logical answer for many questions, but there are questions it is not able to answer, and may never be able to. So why should a young proponent of evolution have to encounter ridicule on this count from a creationist? It would be better if he could say, “At least I can provide possible answers to some of the questions”. The most important thing in the end is the promotion of rationalism and a scientific temper, and all means (even unintentional) that serve that end must be endorsed.

  • http://patrix.typepad.com Patrix

    Prashant – Labelling evolution as a theory is not to dispute the subtle differences between theory and fact but instead to pacify the religious right, which I found despicable.

    Kiran – Yup, exactly! for something that manages to answer most of the questions, it has stood the test of time. But show me something better that expands our knowledge, I will not shy away from adopting it. Till then, evolution is king!

  • Kim

    Darwin for President!

  • chris

    Yes, Evolution is a Theory, but then again so is creation or more specifically , God. There’s probably more evidence for evolution at this point, since we can trace genes and cells. We can’t really trace miracles. Maybe it’s time to insert THE BIBLE IS A THEORY, NOT A FACT….or better yet,THE BIBLE IS A STORY, LIKE THE ODDESSY OR THE LORD OF THE RINGS, DON’T TAKE IT SERIOUSLY, AND CERTAINLY DON’T KILL ANYONE OVER IT.