<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: I Thinkpad, therefore I am</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ipatrix.com/399/i-thinkpad-therefore-i-am/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ipatrix.com/399/i-thinkpad-therefore-i-am/</link> <description>Crossing Borders Crossing Cultures</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:20:00 -0500</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Patrix</title><link>http://www.ipatrix.com/399/i-thinkpad-therefore-i-am/#comment-1969</link> <dc:creator>Patrix</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 06:54:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.adashofash.com/nerveendings/?p=399#comment-1969</guid> <description>&lt;b&gt;Chetan&lt;/b&gt; - I don&#039;t think you can stifle innovative minds for long. The organization may change but you may see those innovative minds spring elsewhere. Competition always gets out the best in people.
&lt;b&gt;Spaceman&lt;/b&gt; - HP unfortunately, even after its mind-altering merger could not compete with Dell. You just need to do things different, instead of different things. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Chetan</b> &#8211; I don&#8217;t think you can stifle innovative minds for long. The organization may change but you may see those innovative minds spring elsewhere. Competition always gets out the best in people.</p><p><b>Spaceman</b> &#8211; HP unfortunately, even after its mind-altering merger could not compete with Dell. You just need to do things different, instead of different things.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Spaceman</title><link>http://www.ipatrix.com/399/i-thinkpad-therefore-i-am/#comment-1968</link> <dc:creator>Spaceman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 22:02:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.adashofash.com/nerveendings/?p=399#comment-1968</guid> <description>IBM has always been a battalion of small companies with a common vision of devouring all the money - hardware, software, networking, services, what have you - that a customer wants to spend. So, this kinda comes as a surprise. Lack of innovation maybe? particularly if you contrast it with the way HP has been able to revive its PC business</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBM has always been a battalion of small companies with a common vision of devouring all the money &#8211; hardware, software, networking, services, what have you &#8211; that a customer wants to spend. So, this kinda comes as a surprise. Lack of innovation maybe? particularly if you contrast it with the way HP has been able to revive its PC business</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chetan</title><link>http://www.ipatrix.com/399/i-thinkpad-therefore-i-am/#comment-1967</link> <dc:creator>Chetan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:41:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.adashofash.com/nerveendings/?p=399#comment-1967</guid> <description>It&#039;s bad news because, so far in the notebook industry (except for Sony), nobody else has done a thing other than packaging components into the box; nobody else has done a butterfly keyboard that&#039;d flip open wide when opened. Such innovation and design is lost for good when a company closes shop or sells it to an unknown bidder. They may sell cheap, but I seriously doubt if they&#039;d rise above the crop of notebook makers to make a difference. And no, it&#039;s definitely not because of sentimental reasons.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s bad news because, so far in the notebook industry (except for Sony), nobody else has done a thing other than packaging components into the box; nobody else has done a butterfly keyboard that&#8217;d flip open wide when opened. Such innovation and design is lost for good when a company closes shop or sells it to an unknown bidder. They may sell cheap, but I seriously doubt if they&#8217;d rise above the crop of notebook makers to make a difference. And no, it&#8217;s definitely not because of sentimental reasons.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Patrix</title><link>http://www.ipatrix.com/399/i-thinkpad-therefore-i-am/#comment-1966</link> <dc:creator>Patrix</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 20:25:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.adashofash.com/nerveendings/?p=399#comment-1966</guid> <description>&lt;b&gt;Smiley&lt;/b&gt; - Reinvention has always been IBM&#039;s forte after it started faltering at the onset of the Information era but seems nicely poised now.Maybe this move to refocus its strategy might be good...pssst rumor has it that they may be interested in buying out Apple.
&lt;b&gt;Chetan&lt;/b&gt; - For sentimental reasons, I agree this is bad news but guess in the fiercely competitive PC market, you gotta keep an eye on your bottomline.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Smiley</b> &#8211; Reinvention has always been IBM&#8217;s forte after it started faltering at the onset of the Information era but seems nicely poised now.Maybe this move to refocus its strategy might be good&#8230;pssst rumor has it that they may be interested in buying out Apple.</p><p><b>Chetan</b> &#8211; For sentimental reasons, I agree this is bad news but guess in the fiercely competitive PC market, you gotta keep an eye on your bottomline.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chetan</title><link>http://www.ipatrix.com/399/i-thinkpad-therefore-i-am/#comment-1965</link> <dc:creator>Chetan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 08:17:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.adashofash.com/nerveendings/?p=399#comment-1965</guid> <description>This is bad news indeed. Atleast for Thinkpad fans. I felt something similar when intel abandoned their tiny microscope that I promised myself I&#039;d get for my kid when she went to school.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is bad news indeed. Atleast for Thinkpad fans. I felt something similar when intel abandoned their tiny microscope that I promised myself I&#8217;d get for my kid when she went to school.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: :-)</title><link>http://www.ipatrix.com/399/i-thinkpad-therefore-i-am/#comment-1964</link> <dc:creator>:-)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2004 06:09:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.adashofash.com/nerveendings/?p=399#comment-1964</guid> <description>Yeah..its a surprise how heartless business can be. Especially the American corporate never seemed to have any problem with &#039;letting it go&#039;.
IBM is reinventing (already did) itself as a services company.
But sometimes I wonder about the soft assets that get hurt when companies make moves like these based on balance sheet and stock price.
Assuming that the dudes who are leading IBM are 100 times smarter than I am, I cant do nothing much beyond raising an eye brow.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah..its a surprise how heartless business can be. Especially the American corporate never seemed to have any problem with &#8216;letting it go&#8217;.</p><p>IBM is reinventing (already did) itself as a services company.</p><p>But sometimes I wonder about the soft assets that get hurt when companies make moves like these based on balance sheet and stock price.</p><p>Assuming that the dudes who are leading IBM are 100 times smarter than I am, I cant do nothing much beyond raising an eye brow.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
