Grilled in Armor

Standing before a set of Broadway proportions, Donald Rumsfeld — officially known as the Secretary of Defense but widely regarded as the master of all press conferences and journalist intimidator was finally stumped. Questioned by a lowly soldier about the lack of armor on tanks that go into Falluja and cheered by other soldiers, Rumsfeld stumbled for an answer effectively saying that there is an army that you wish for but in reality there is an army that you actually have, thereby crushing any morale that was remaining in the killing sands of Iraq. If that wasn’t enough, he compounded the guffaw gaffe by ending his response with these immortal words, “You can put all the armor in the world on a tank and it still can be blown up”. Ok, at least he was truthful but that surely doesn’t seem reassuring to a draf; enlisted army man.

Everyone instantly jumped on the incident and the newslines and late-night shows were buzzing with this controversial exchange. Everyone had a fair idea of the army inadequacies in Iraq but this was the first time, concern was voiced by a foot soldier — the primary stakeholder. Republicans, of course in their indomitable style tried to skirt the issue by highlighting the fact that the soldier was propped up by an antagonistic media journalist. But the fact remains that the question was asked by a soldier AND cheered by hundreds of other armed personnel present. If Republicans are alluding to the fact that all of them were unfairly prejudiced against the Pentagon, then we have a far bigger problem than missing armor.

Troop morale almost always determines the outcome of organized conflict. Lack of hardware as an excuse offered by Rumsfeld doesn’t bode well for the most well-equipped army of the world. No amount of blame being passed on the Democrats who tried to block the $87 billion largesse for Iraqi reconstruction is going to help (the appropriation bill did pass after all). Does it really matter who coaxed the soldier to ask the question, if it is really reflective of the ground realities in Iraq?

The Vietnamization of Iraq is slowly gaining credibility.


Related Posts

  1. Answer this question, Mr. Kamal Nath
  2. Protect your head…or not!
  3. Unhindered Dominance

  • Heretic

    1. Guffaw=loud laugh. Gaffe=blunder.
    2. Primary stakeholders are the Iraqis.

    I completely agree with the rest. Great post!
    Strength to the man on the [Iraqi] street(s).

  • http://whereami.rediffblogs.com Seema

    Thank goodness Heretic cleared that thing about “Guffaw” otherwise I would have spent sleepless nights wondering why Mr. Secretary of Defence laughed when such a question was asked! Well written buddy :)

  • m

    It is what it is – and it seems that Americans and the rest of the world are pretty powerless- they dont know how to extricate themselves. Sorry state of affairs……..not a happy way to start the oncoming new year………but will wish it to you any way. Happy New Year.

  • http://ipatrix.com Patrix

    Heretic – Thanks buddy..call it a Freudian slip. Stakeholders may be Iraqis but the person directly affected apparently for no logical reason is the American soldier..merely obeying orders. But thanks for pointing out the errors…reminds me to at least proof-read post which I write sometime back.

    Seema – Rumsfeld could have even laughed so not entirely a gaffe on my part :)

    M – Wait! its not even Christmas yet and you already wishing me Happy New Years…not around that time kya?

  • m

    gone to tenerife till the second……….

  • alpha

    btw, that ‘guffaw’ thing. oh, its crossed..sorry, gaffed!
    cool man.

  • ankita

    Glad to hear that somebody is taking the effort to expose Bush and his government to be the fatheaded retarded fascist assholes that they are. I think taht most of the world always knew they were twats. Its time for America to find out that they’re being led by I.R.Baboon in the first major war of this century.

    I dont think there’s any question of credibility left with this regime of power-hungry scnoodles. After all, a foreign policy that basically declares that in the 21st century a war can have a moral justification, causes them to lose whatever little credibility they had to begin with.

    aaarrgh, to wait for 2008. The democrats shall win, or ill eat my socks.

  • http://ipatrix.com Patrix

    M – Have fun! Hope to hear some fun stuff when you get back.

    Alpha – Too bad you are getting slow at these things nowadays..must be the age thing, right? :)

    Ankita – The way the Democrats are stuffing their foot in their mouth too, you better start marinating your socks, smellier the better…should be done by 2008.