Grilled in Armor
Everyone instantly jumped on the incident and the newslines and late-night shows were buzzing with this controversial exchange. Everyone had a fair idea of the army inadequacies in Iraq but this was the first time, concern was voiced by a foot soldier — the primary stakeholder. Republicans, of course in their indomitable style tried to skirt the issue by highlighting the fact that the soldier was propped up by an antagonistic media journalist. But the fact remains that the question was asked by a soldier AND cheered by hundreds of other armed personnel present. If Republicans are alluding to the fact that all of them were unfairly prejudiced against the Pentagon, then we have a far bigger problem than missing armor.
Troop morale almost always determines the outcome of organized conflict. Lack of hardware as an excuse offered by Rumsfeld doesn’t bode well for the most well-equipped army of the world. No amount of blame being passed on the Democrats who tried to block the $87 billion largesse for Iraqi reconstruction is going to help (the appropriation bill did pass after all). Does it really matter who coaxed the soldier to ask the question, if it is really reflective of the ground realities in Iraq?
The Vietnamization of Iraq is slowly gaining credibility.
Related Posts
- Heretic
- http://whereami.rediffblogs.com Seema
- m
- http://ipatrix.com Patrix
- m
- alpha
- ankita
- http://ipatrix.com Patrix


