Till death do them part…literally!

Every Christian wedding has a common vow ingrained — “for better or for worse, in sickness and in health, until death do you part”. But at the same time, these words do not mean a lot in the ensuing marriage as divorce rates peak at nearly 50%. This has often been berated as degradation of familial culture and has been blamed nearly for all social ills that befall the American society. So how do you rescue a “culture in decline”? Pass legislation. A covenant marriage, a legally binding contract available in some southern states (Arkansas, Arizona, and Louisiana) commits a couple to counseling before any separation and limits divorce to a handful of grounds, like adultery or abuse.

“Under the covenant, the couples express their intention to remain married for life and agree to premarital counseling from a counselor or member of the clergy, and to seek further counseling before filing for divorce. Also, they are restricted to a handful of legal grounds for divorce; adultery, felony conviction, one year of abandonment, sexual or physical abuse and separation of at least two years.”

Dissatisfaction in your married life, or incompatibility; emotional, physical, or otherwise, is no longer considered solid grounds for divorce. India on the other hand is moving in the opposite direction. If not legally, where a judge still “expects the wife to give company to her husband in the evenings and night” even if the wife is working during those hours, the social thought in at least the Indian cities have experienced change.

One of my friends recently went through a divorce purely on incompatibility grounds and was given a waiting period of more than a year, wherein she was expected to sort out matters, if possible. But she had no such inclination and wanted out immediately. Thankfully her parents supported her decision wholeheartedly. The law argues that it prevents impulsive decision making regarding a
serious institution of marriage and even requires parental approval in
some cases. But at the same time, it respects an adult individual’s right completely if you want to get married, even if in matters that involve eloping and going against your parent’s wishes.

Of course, marriage is a serious thing and should not be tossed aside for flimsy reasons. I do not see any bad in seeking counseling before divorce. I, however do not understand the state’s concern in legislating personal matters. Gov. Mike Huckabee, Arkansas remarried his wife under the new covenant marriage edict in a much-publicized ceremony to give a fillip to the totally voluntary option. But statistics show that it hasn’t found many takers; less than 1-2% of couples. People are not voluntarily likely to get into any contract that makes them difficult to get out of, especially if it for life.

But in India they do; everyday; in thousands. These states should take a lesson or two from India where it works much better when social and societal constraints make it almost impossible to come out of a marriage in spite of deep differences. Heck, a wife will let herself be beaten by a drunken husband, taunted by sarcastic in-laws, or even burnt to death than “dishonor” her family. Cheers to such commitment, eh? Who needs covenant marriages in India when we already have our society that protects our moral fiber? Things seem to be changing.

An India Today cover story titled ‘Divorce goes young’ (Feb 28, 2005) notes that 70% of divorces now involve couples below 35 years of age, driven apart by stressful lifestyles and intolerance” (via Youth Curry).

Marriage in a metropolitan life — is an interesting subject. I’ll write more later.



  • http://ajju.us/blog Ajju

    The South makes me feel so much at home. The Republican Party is Georgia’s (and the dirty South’s) Shiv Sena.

    I didn’t expect this from Arizona though. Welcome to the South y’all Arizonians, or whatever you like to be called!

  • Ram

    Should there be a separation between marriage and state like church and state. There is a separation between church and state. Let’s get the state out of the marriage business altogether. I saw this on an episode to the west wing and is it really that crazy. As long the couple are within the confines of the law.

  • http://imsri.blogspot.com Ramana

    My, my…some post. Hey, how’ve you been Pratik? Long time…huh?

  • http://www.parablog.com/ Parag

    As long as this covenent marriage is a choice and not a requirement of getting married, then it is OK. If some people feel that they have to go through such legal proceedings to make a strong foundation for their marriage, so be it. There are others, who don’t take any vows and still stay loyal to each other till the death do them part.

    Divorce in younger Indians is becoming more prevalent. I had never heard of divorce while growing up but, 4 (out of ~100) of my school and college classmates are divorced. It is still not as high as 50% of marriages as in US but, it will slowly catch up (at least in cities) as Indians become more individualists.

  • http://ipatrix.com Patrix

    Ajju – Too bad the South doesn’t come with vada pav and zunka bhakar stands :)

    Ram – Yup. But still we need the law to ratify the marriage for other purposes i.e. taxes, inheiritance, ailmony (in case of divorce). We can’t cling to the law when it is convinient.

    Ramana – Hey there..really loooong time. Where have u been?

    Parag – My only problem is that this law might be a backdoor for more legislation on marriage. If the state is considered a righteous authority on sanctioning seperation, then it might also one day decide if we are compatible to marry the person we want to. That is scary.

  • http://gratisgab.blogspot.com GratisGab

    It does seem like as long as this is a choice for the couple to make, it’s fine, and I agreed with Parag….But when you think about it, this country already requires a marriage license so what prevents them to do their own risk-analysis (hmmm.. i see job opportunities opening up) before granting it? They do do some obvious checks even now…

  • http://ash.typepad.com Ash

    Gabby, ( yeah thats what Ive decided to call you now :p), haahh ! If we had to do risk analysis for any relationship, let alone marriage, we’d never dare enter anything like that !

    But yeah I agree with Parag, as long as its voluntary, it shouldnt be an issue. But then again, as Patrix rightly speculates, it shouldnt be a way for the government to legislate marriage.

    But hmmm, on further thought, “marriage” per se, atleast in the US is more of a legal institution, no ? If it wasnt then any guy and girl could validate their commitment in their own little made-up ceremony and get “married”.

  • http://gratisgab.blogspot.com GratisGab

    See Ash, I wouldn’t want the State to do the risk analysis for me but at some level don’t we all do some of that? I wouldn’t go as far as coining it as P&B (Potential and Background) ratings as one of my girlfriends calls it but tho the flutter-flutter-in-the-heart might happen with no knowledge of the risk/no-risk factor, the long term commitment of marriage has some risk-analysis baked into it. It might often happen at a sub-conscious level.

  • http://ipatrix.com Patrix

    Gratis/Ash – All I want to say is that the government has no business legislating my personal action. If I am a rash decision-maker, I’ll suffer its consequences and not repeat it again. Does the state want to legislate over break-ups as in “love relationships”? Risk analysis is best done by the individual; after all it is my life.