Location, Location, and Location

I was at Cresskill, a tiny city in New Jersey several months back. Its highlight was its proximity to the Big Apple. It is a small town, complete with picturesque squares, neighborhood shopping centers, friendly neighbors and bustling schools. The cars that ran on the roads were mostly mini-vans clearly giving the impression that many families lived in the vicinity. However the traffic was distinctly different during two times of the day — early morning and late afternoon. During these times, the narrow streets were lined with NJ Transit buses, ferrying almost the entire town’s population to the nearest big city — New York. One of the greatest selling points of this little town was its proximity to the Big Apple. Cresskill was like any other American suburb — a bedroom community. The local population largely worked outside the city limits, coming back only to watch sitcoms, eat dinner and go to sleep.

Urban areas have been slowly bulging at their seams, unable to keep everyone within its limited confines. Cost of living has rocketed and standard of living has plummeted. Living in a bustling megapolis like New York is certainly wrought with rising crime and sub-standard living conditions. Erstwhile unknown towns, like Cresskill suddenly gained prominence as people willing to commute and shell out money for the extra comforts began moving away from the city. There are hundreds of such towns; Edison being the Desi hub along the New York-New Jersey line. These towns have a distinct identity but cannot for a moment deny the common thread and link to the adjacent megapolis. Rejuvenating downtowns of such small towns make for a better living as the residents strive to delineate a town culture. This phenomenon is not only America-centric but also has been seen in India. Bombay-New Bombay, Delhi-Noida, Hyderabad-Secundarbad, etc. are few of such cities with satellite townships, as is known in town planning lingo.

The question asked in recent times is whether the relationship between such settlements remains equal or does it have the tendency to experience a role-reversal. Cresskill is definitely too tiny to even dream of rivaling New York but New Bombay is certainly gaining ground on Bombay. Be it conscious efforts of the government to locate primary functions like the wholesale market, steel market, or domestic airport or market-based decisions of people to locate themselves outside the city, the movement definitely is afoot. The role reversal may never occur but it sure is interesting to study such hidden relationships between settlements.



  • http://phil0s0pher.rediffblogs.com Anwesha

    This reminds me of the puzzle- make a line smaller without rubbing it. The only way this can be done is by making a comparatively bigger line adajescent to the pervious one. The latter one obviously without tampering with the previous one, makes it smaller. Similarly to avoid crowd, i.e.an old city getting over-populated, a more well organized, urbanized city nearby is developed. At least this is the case with Delhi-Gurgaon equation, i guess.

  • m

    in india this concept works because the town is overpopulated and over built…….there is no space for infrastructure changes. i know south bombay is the way it was 100 years ago. in the west infrastructure is largely there- it is just a case of overcrowding

  • Someone

    Dunno about cresskill..but new bombay is definitely .. most definitely not gaining ground on bombay..puhleeeezzzzz !!

  • http://gratisgab.blogspot.com GratisGab

    Patrix, a small clarification – The twin cities of Hyderabad-Secundarbad don’t really fall into this group…there are a bunch of stories on how these “sister” cities came to be (muslim prince of one married hindu girl from other being my fav) but the more modern trend you’ve observed here of is not one of them…neat read though.

  • Harshil

    I live in Edison, and it is definitely a hub for those who commute to Newark or NYC everday. This is not to say that Edison is gaining any ground on being a city or anything. Its population is fairly big, but it just doesnt have the feel of a city. Its a town, and will remain one for a while.

  • http://ipatrix.com Patrix

    Anwesha – Nice analogy. And it works too. Delhi-Gurgaon sans the emphasis on swank hip malls would certainly ease the emphasis on Delhi. You have to lure the lower income group away and let them enjoy the comforts of a ownership housing rather than cramped rented slums.

    M – Overcrowding and expanding cities are caught in a Catch-22 situation. One wouldn’t exist without the other and thus one has to be dealt to help ameriolate the condition of the other.

    Someone – Mark my words. You will soon see Bombay as a office-centric Manhattan-like district and mass commuting from the mainland. Bombay and New Bombay will soon merge and form a megapolis.

    Gabby – You may be right. I may have overstated my comparison. Thanks for the correction though.

    Harshil – Ah-ha! such are the pangs of a bedroom community. It doesn’t have much to call its own.

  • Harshil

    Well, you would think that Edison, obviously named after the great scientist Thomas Edison, would have some sort of recognition for the man. We can call him our own, hometown hero of sorts, but alas, the people of the Edison community don’t really care for the man who brough them DC current. Its a shame!

  • http://ipatrix.com Patrix

    Harshil – It is maybe because they are just too busy earning the big bucks. Sense of a place should be present to make a home. Too bad it is merely a temporary abode for some.

  • Pingback: Nilesh's Weblog

  • Pingback: Nilesh's Weblog