If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed or email alerts. Thanks for visiting!
Imagine this - the U.S military sent in by the belligerent White House following a terrorist attack unleashes its most deadliest weapon. The B-52 bombers drop its payload right on top of the rogue regime’s biggest city and transforms it to - San Francisco. A month later, an orange bridge pops up, chic beauty salons and fancy coffee shops are bustling with people as a Pride parade makes it way down the street. Flummoxed? Well, you can’t make such stuff up.
It was recently revealed that the U.S. military was working on a hormone bomb that would turn enemy combatants into homosexuals and make them more interested in sex than fighting. I am not sure what is more funny; that you can make people gay or the belief that gay people are always obsessed about sex and hence won’t fight. The proposal suggested, “One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior” and even budgeted the proposal at $7.5 million. So if such a bomb was indeed developed and detonated, you would be Saving Ryan’s privates. Or burrowing into foxholes could have a whole different meaning. Or surprising the enemy by attacking them from the rear. Imagine a gay Bin Laden. Ah! the possibilities are endless. Someone at the DoD took the adage, Make Love not War far too seriously.
Update: The military gay bomb has now inspired an adult movie.
tags: gay, homosexual, bomb, military
Article Tags >> Fun Weird | United States


June 18th, 2007 at 3:09 pm reply
They’re taking the hippie slogan of “Make love not war” too far :-)
June 18th, 2007 at 5:58 pm reply
Hilarious stuff! :) Although I would have preferred to throw a tranny bomb. That would make the soldiers implode with embarrasment. (I would hope so!)
June 18th, 2007 at 6:34 pm reply
Santosh, no better way to bring back the hippie age, eh?
Piker, heh. If you could only ‘transform’ enemy combatants any which way you like, Gitmo would be a laugh riot :)
June 19th, 2007 at 8:09 am reply
Hmm. So the basic assumption is that gay men will not fight but will try to groom the enemy combatants. So all the gay men being fired from US army were fired because they were just prettying the army barracks up?
June 19th, 2007 at 9:51 am reply
Sakshi, I’m sure the soldiers wouldn’t mind prettying up the barracks even if such a characterization were true :)
June 19th, 2007 at 10:05 am reply
On a more serious note, it seems to me like it would transform them into sex maniacs. This could actually prove counter-productive especially for POWs.
June 19th, 2007 at 11:04 am reply
Santosh, yup! sex deprivation could then be used as a torture technique.