If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed or email alerts. Thanks for visiting!
The images are larger than any of the victims he mercilessly killed. Murmurs of protest are already emerging from Blackburg and asking questions whether NBC was right in airing the video and showing the pictures of their worst nightmare. Dave Winer believes that NBC should release the full video and considers it wrong of NBC to hold on to them. Doc Searls puts it more gently and says that there may be more consequences to holding on to the content than to releasing it. Given that we live in a viral Web 2.0 world, it doesn’t take long for any content be it text, images or video to get around and those protesting against the release cite the fear of copycat murders being motivated and seeking similar infamy.
I can imagine that NBC must have thought long and hard about this decision and although the windfall of getting such content must have been good for their bottomline, their decision to inundate the grieving viewers with such graphic content would have been foolhardy and lead to a public relations disaster.
America holds the principle of free speech close to its heart and has fiercely protected this right although certain speech like the recent Don Imus outburst has tested the limits. Regarding the Cho Seung-hui video, his rights to an audience aren’t in question but in fact, the need for the people to understand the deviant psyche that motivated him to act this way is. Would be better informed or learn something from these videos and images? Perhaps. We may hear his words and attempt to understand his emotions and if it weren’t for his heinous actions, some may even sympathize.
But that is exactly what the people who oppose do not want. A student in California who hinted that he sympathized with Cho Seung-hui got into trouble with the school authorities. I completely understand that the nation is on the edge and inspite of the overwhelming feeling of common sorrow, there is a latent feeling of suspicion and fear against the people around you; especially so if they happen to be of a different ethnic background. The messages of a killer are always chilling and although may appear rational on the face of it, the emotional affect on the survivors can be devastating. Imagine the plight of the girl who was among the four in a class of 30 who survived having to see the face of the killer in self-aggrandizing pomposity and emotions of victimization. Can she see any reason in the words of an individual who gunned down her colleagues in cold blood?
That said, I am not sure I would support censoring his videos but the question arises who would be responsible for what we should see and what we shouldn’t? NBC? The federal authorities? Virginia Tech? The survivors? If Cho Seung-hui had chosen to upload the video on YouTube before he went on his killing spree, then the onus would have been on YouTube. Like it or not, we are now a voyueristic culture that cannot resist the temptation of a raunchy school kids MMS or the Saddam hanging. And frankly, there is no telling what effect any images might have on any of us. There just might be an animal hidden in one of us that is waiting to be unleashed. If it isn’t this video, then probably it will be some other.
by Patrix | on Friday, April 20th, 2007 at 10:39 am | 
Current Affairs, Media . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
April 20th, 2007 at 3:18 pm reply
One of the things that irks people is naturally that we are feeding the expectations of his warped psyche. This is exactly what he would have wanted and in fact expected; to see his photos splattered across the front page of every paper.
April 21st, 2007 at 9:14 am reply
Ashutosh, I don’t understand why NBC is blamed. They merely released the information and showed it during Nightly News which I think they should have (why should NBC act censor) but I blame CNN/Fox etc. for looping the tapes and over-analyzing.
April 22nd, 2007 at 12:34 pm reply
It was sensational journalism at its worst..i am blaming CNN/FOx more than NBC…didn’t see any purpose served in airing those pictures and tapes other than boosting their viewership! if there was anythign to be learned form the tapes then it was for criminal psychologists not for the common audience, greiving families and impressionable youngsters.
April 22nd, 2007 at 5:49 pm reply
Orchid, I know. The media coverage which partially redeemed itself during Katrina sort of lost it during this tragedy. They sometime over-report and over-analyze a story…making news instead of reporting it.