<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Popular is your Blog?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipatrix.com/measure-blog-link-popularity-tool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipatrix.com/measure-blog-link-popularity-tool/</link>
	<description>Crossing Borders Crossing Cultures</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ranjan</title>
		<link>http://www.ipatrix.com/measure-blog-link-popularity-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-9970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipatrix.com/2007/04/07/measure-blog-link-popularity-tool/#comment-9970</guid>
		<description>I feel that between credibility (content) and visibility (networking tools), focus should be on credibility. But I find us to be obsessed with the visibility part.

But content without network is frustrating. There has to be a fine balance.

Thanks for the links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that between credibility (content) and visibility (networking tools), focus should be on credibility. But I find us to be obsessed with the visibility part.</p>
<p>But content without network is frustrating. There has to be a fine balance.</p>
<p>Thanks for the links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
