March 31st, 2008

Media Coverage and Federal Spending

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed or email alerts. Thanks for visiting!

“Federal spending is lower in areas where there is less press coverage of the local members of Congress.” Interesting. I would’ve expected the opposite considering that legislators might want to sneak in earmarks if no one is watching over them [via MR].

by Patrix | on Monday, March 31st, 2008 at 5:39 pm | Posted In Asides, Governance, Media . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Related Posts

If you did not find the information you were looking for or were not satisfied with this post then you might want to read the following related posts:

Recent Popular Posts

Comments are closed. If you still want to express your comments, send me an email

Popular Tags

Recent Comments

  • Ashutosh: For once I am with
  • Amit: Chapter 11 helps a company
  • Patrix: @Lekhni: Do you really think
  • Lekhni: A Chapter 11 bankruptcy (i.e.
  • Patrix: @Ashutosh: All I want is
  • Ashutosh: Quite true. The point about
  • Market for news » India Syndicate 2.0: [...] interesting write-up by Patrix
  • U.S. may embrace Obama, Aggie racism marches on, yet | Chronosynclastic Infundibulum: [...] up! The Aggies are
  • karla: it is a shame that
  • GaBunnie: As to the Mormon comment,

    • Archives

    Categories


Search this site

 (Help)

as   
include results from
sort by

Jump up to the Main Content