If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed or email alerts. Thanks for visiting!
Much of the movie’s beauty lies in the different interpretations by the two opposing parties who try to twist the ambiguous Florida voting laws to their advantage. Since the first count showed Bush to be the winner, the Bush camp is desperate to stall any recounting whereas the Gore camp is trying desperately to get the recounts going in at least the counties that usually lean Democratic. The extremely small margin of 534 votes among millions of votes cast in one of the most populous states of the United States showed how close the race was. Add to that the various pre-election strategies by the Bush camp to disenfranchise voters that generally lean Democratic also added color to the story. This story wouldn’t be complete without talking about the various election paraphernalia like butterfly ballots, chad (plural of chad is also chad, we were told), hanging or dimpled chads, etc. Probably intentional but the movie also showed contrastingly styles of the Gore and Bush campaigns. The Gore camp chose the fair and legal route aimed at including all the votes cast and arguing for the voters intent whereas on the other hand, the Bush camp led by James Baker (played by Tom Wilkinson) essayed a more sinister touch with literally street brawl-type politics that the Indian hinterland is known for. The confusion was finally settled first in the Florida Supreme Court and then the United States Supreme Court (which voted 5-4 in favor of Bush) by halting the recount. As Klain screams at one point that he would just like to know who really won considering that the votes were never really recounted and given the extremely small margin of victory in a large state subjected to voter suppression, it might’ve gone either way. But then as Michael Whouley (played by Dennis Leary) put it nicely that hindsight is 20/20 because any event in the preceding year however minor could have also tilted the election the other way. At one point during the movie, the opposing camps were showing literally cheering addition of every single vote in their column during the recounting process.
It sounds surprising that a country known for its technological prowess cannot conduct a simple election with electronic means without kicking up such a fuss. However lack of technology implementation alone cannot be blame. The constitutional basis of the United States is such that every state or even county has its own set of rules pertaining to the election even if it is a federal election. To top it all, the laws are subject to whimsical enforcement by state officials who are even hold conflict-of-interest positions. For example, Katherine Harris delightfully played by Laura Dern in charge of certifying the election results and responsible for granting extensions for vote recounts was also the campaign co-chair for Bush. The failure of the system to count dimpled or hanging chad that clearly reflects the intent of the voters can easily be considered a travesty of the democratic system. But in the end, it was also nice to know that the system is much more transparent and accountable than it is elsewhere. Just because such problems do not crop up elsewhere in the world does not mean they do not exist (if you are unaware of voter fraud, then does it exist?) Poor Florida and its elderly denizens received much flak for messing up what may have been the most important election of its time given how subsequent events over the past seven years have turned out.
The movie does a fine job of narrating the intensely complex and emotionally-wrought story of those four weeks. I can imagine if Gore was watching the movie, he must have been wringing his hands in frustration and wondering if he could only go back in time and tweak some little detail. After all, it was only 534 votes.
by Patrix | on Tuesday, May 27th, 2008 at 2:54 pm | 
Movies, Television, United States, Weblogs . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
May 27th, 2008 at 3:52 pm reply
I have this movie on DVR and intend to watch it as soon as I can. I can remember the November 2000 recount and all the drama surrounding it like it happened yesterday, since I was a student in Tallahassee at that time.
May 27th, 2008 at 4:12 pm reply
Had TVoed it and watched it yesterday. Nicely done.
Minor correction or may be I just read it that way. The Florida Supreme Court actually was in favor of the recount. It was an unprecedented decision by the US Supreme court that put an end to it. It was a decision that was limited to that case and to top it off, it was for that hearing that the recount was stopped and then the courts decided that now there is no time left. Stupid.
May 27th, 2008 at 9:04 pm reply
Greg Palast did a fine job of chronicling the organized voter disenfranchisement in Florida. Check out his book, aptly titled The Best Democracy Money Can Buy. I’m wondering how much of his work made it into the movie.
Jai ho democracy ki.
May 27th, 2008 at 9:35 pm reply
Santosh, I’m sure being in the thick of the action must have been much more exciting.
Sakshi, Yup, the Florida Supreme Court as the Bush camp says in the movie, was filled with liberals who favored a recount but the time-delaying tactics proved to be too much until of course, the 5-4 US Supreme Court decision. I still couldn’t understand what ‘irreparable harm’ could have been done by the recount.
Amit, thanks for the suggestion but I’m not sure I will be able to get to it soon. My reading waiting list is long right now :)
May 29th, 2008 at 4:00 pm reply
[...] definitely deserved a better White House and given how close that election was, it could have been so different. We feared the worst and expected the best from this [...]
June 3rd, 2008 at 3:37 pm reply
I watched this one on DVR finally. Amazing movie but frustrating at the same time. I realized I knew the real Clay Roberts (Supervisor Elections).